Skip to main content

WHEN YOU HAVE A TOUGH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE (ALJ)

 

 

When you have a "tough" judge

Let's face it.  Administrative Law Judges are not created equal.  Or if they are, they don't stay that way.

At the same hearing office, you may step into Courtroom 1 and have a hearing presided over by a judge who pays 70 percent of cases. (My dream)!

Step into Courtroom 2 and get a judge who pays 16 percent of cases (Your worst nightmare)!

A recent OIG report states that in a Dallas area hearing office, one of the judges grants 95% of claims, and another of the judges grants just 9% of claims. That's an 86-point spread. Social Security disability has well defined requirements and it should not be a lotto.

The award rate for the typical Administrative Law Judge, however, is in the neighborhood of 50 percent nationwide.

But if you are unfortunate enough to draw a judge who consistently pays very few claims--based on God-knows-what-- what can you do?

 The first thing I suggest is:  Be sure you go to trial with a professional medical opinion!  Get the claimant's doctor to provide a detailed and acceptable medical opinion about what the claimant can and cannot do in  terms of work-related activity.  These statements are called "Medical Source Statements" or "Residual Functional Capacity opinions."  Don't let the doctor wander around in the wilderness when providing an opinion, or more correctly--a series of opinions.  Use a tried and true form that covers all the bases in a format that is admissible and acceptable to Social Security.  Admissible and Acceptable!  This still may not get you approved but it gives you good ammunition for your next appeal.

 Second, try to customize the doctor's form to fit your case as much as possible.  A Medical Source Statement for a patient with heart failure shouldn't look just like the one for  rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative disc disease.  Your attorney/representative should have, or be able to devise, a form that suits the claimant's medical or psychological profile.

Third, be sure the RFC or Medical Source Statement is signed by what Social Security calls an "acceptable medical source."  Doctors of Medicine (MDs) are always acceptable sources.  But Social Security has a "pecking order" for doctors.  A board certified specialist carries more credibility than a family practice physician, especially when opining about "specialty diseases."  A cardiologist carries more weight when opining about heart disease.  But an orthopedic surgeon is better for bone and joint disease.  And for heaven's sake, try to get a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist (Psy.D or Ph.D) for depression or mental illness.  A diagnosis from a counselor, chiropractor or nurse practitioner may not carry the weight you need.  Try for a heavy hitter!

Fourth, consider using collaborating testimony outside the medical field, if available and compelling.  A former supervisor or perhaps a family member who can provide convincing testimony about the claimant's struggles and problems with past work or current activities of daily living.  An objective witness with no "skin in the game" is always better.  But be careful!  A lay person must not give a medical opinion.  And this witness must testify only about what he/she has seen or experienced first hand.  This is not "expert testimony," this is subjective testimony and it can backfire like a Russian-made motorcycle.  So take it for a spin before putting it on the witness stand. "Does this witness really strengthen my case?" 

Lastly, keep your appeals pencil sharpened.  In their effort to deny as many claims as possible, some of the "outlier" judges make serious mistakes in their decisions.  If appealable errors were possibly made, fire off an appeal.  The Social Security system is build on checks and balances:  judges rule and other judges overrule.

"Judges rule and other judges overrule.  Social Security is built on a checks and balances system."

_____________________

Charles W. Forsythe is managing partner at The Forsythe Firm in Huntsville, AL - a firm specializing in Social Security justice.  

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASE

What are the top 3 most important factors in a Social Security disability case? 1.  Medical Evidence. 2.  Medical Evidence 3.  Medical Evidence 4-10     Medical Evidence Federal regulations set the eligibility requirements for Social Security disability (SSDI) benefits.  A claimant must meet these strict legal requirements More than anything else, the claimant's medical evidence will determine the outcome of the claim or appeal.  Without strong objective medical evidence Social Security cannot legally pay you a benefit. Objective Medical Evidence means the result of medical examinations, laboratory tests or imaging studies (X-rays, PT scans, MRI or CT scans). This type of evidence can only be obtained by going to your doctor. There's an old adage that says truthfully:  "The path to Social Security disability benefits runs straight through your doctor's office."  Being approved for an SSDI benefit requires objective medical proof. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

SOCIAL SECRITY DISABILITY: THE DECISION WRITING PROCESS

  By Charles W. Forsythe - The Forsythe Firm in Huntsville An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) has made a decision on your Social Security disability appeal hearing. The decision must now be sent to to a process called "Decision Writing" - where an attorney or paralegal will draft the formal binding decision, explaining the judge's legal rationale for the decision and explaining the mandatory 5-Step decision making process. The decision writing process translates a judge's ruling into a formal, legally binding document. It is a vital but time-consuming phase that ensures all medical evidence and vocational factors align with the law. A typical written decision will be 10 to 20 pages, thus very detailed.  It takes time to write one. There are many decisions ahead of yours and usually they are written in the order received. The step-by-step process breaks down as follows: The Judge’s Ruling & Instructions:  Following your hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) r...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNDERSTANDING THE 5-STEP SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY PROCESS

Receiving Social Security disability payments depend on one thing:  Proving that you are not able to work. The one and only thing that SSDI pays for is the physical and/or mental inability to work for a period of at least 12 months.  Who decides if you are able to work?  The Social Security Administration (SSA) will decide.--according to their own strict rules and regulations. In reaching that important decision, are you disabled or not, Social Security must use a 5-step examination process.  It's important to understand these 5 sequential steps. STEP 1:  The work Test .  Is the claimant now engaged in Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)?  If yes, the claim is denied at Step 1.  They look no further.  You cannot be eligible for SSDI benefits if you are working at SGA, regardles of your medical condition.  (In 2026 you are working at SGA if you earn at least $1,690 per month from work or self-employment). STEP 2.  The Medical Requirem...
Post a Comment
Read more