Skip to main content

WHEN YOU HAVE A TOUGH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE (ALJ)

 

 

When you have a "tough" judge

Let's face it.  Administrative Law Judges are not created equal.  Or if they are, they don't stay that way.

At the same hearing office, you may step into Courtroom 1 and have a hearing presided over by a judge who pays 70 percent of cases. (My dream)!

Step into Courtroom 2 and get a judge who pays 16 percent of cases (Your worst nightmare)!

A recent OIG report states that in a Dallas area hearing office, one of the judges grants 95% of claims, and another of the judges grants just 9% of claims. That's an 86-point spread. Social Security disability has well defined requirements and it should not be a lotto.

The award rate for the typical Administrative Law Judge, however, is in the neighborhood of 50 percent nationwide.

But if you are unfortunate enough to draw a judge who consistently pays very few claims--based on God-knows-what-- what can you do?

 The first thing I suggest is:  Be sure you go to trial with a professional medical opinion!  Get the claimant's doctor to provide a detailed and acceptable medical opinion about what the claimant can and cannot do in  terms of work-related activity.  These statements are called "Medical Source Statements" or "Residual Functional Capacity opinions."  Don't let the doctor wander around in the wilderness when providing an opinion, or more correctly--a series of opinions.  Use a tried and true form that covers all the bases in a format that is admissible and acceptable to Social Security.  Admissible and Acceptable!  This still may not get you approved but it gives you good ammunition for your next appeal.

 Second, try to customize the doctor's form to fit your case as much as possible.  A Medical Source Statement for a patient with heart failure shouldn't look just like the one for  rheumatoid arthritis or degenerative disc disease.  Your attorney/representative should have, or be able to devise, a form that suits the claimant's medical or psychological profile.

Third, be sure the RFC or Medical Source Statement is signed by what Social Security calls an "acceptable medical source."  Doctors of Medicine (MDs) are always acceptable sources.  But Social Security has a "pecking order" for doctors.  A board certified specialist carries more credibility than a family practice physician, especially when opining about "specialty diseases."  A cardiologist carries more weight when opining about heart disease.  But an orthopedic surgeon is better for bone and joint disease.  And for heaven's sake, try to get a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist (Psy.D or Ph.D) for depression or mental illness.  A diagnosis from a counselor, chiropractor or nurse practitioner may not carry the weight you need.  Try for a heavy hitter!

Fourth, consider using collaborating testimony outside the medical field, if available and compelling.  A former supervisor or perhaps a family member who can provide convincing testimony about the claimant's struggles and problems with past work or current activities of daily living.  An objective witness with no "skin in the game" is always better.  But be careful!  A lay person must not give a medical opinion.  And this witness must testify only about what he/she has seen or experienced first hand.  This is not "expert testimony," this is subjective testimony and it can backfire like a Russian-made motorcycle.  So take it for a spin before putting it on the witness stand. "Does this witness really strengthen my case?" 

Lastly, keep your appeals pencil sharpened.  In their effort to deny as many claims as possible, some of the "outlier" judges make serious mistakes in their decisions.  If appealable errors were possibly made, fire off an appeal.  The Social Security system is build on checks and balances:  judges rule and other judges overrule.

"Judges rule and other judges overrule.  Social Security is built on a checks and balances system."

_____________________

Charles W. Forsythe is managing partner at The Forsythe Firm in Huntsville, AL - a firm specializing in Social Security justice.  

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RED FLAGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASES

  RED FLAGS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASE A red flag is something that causes concern or raises a problem in a Social Security disability case.   In short, it’s something that may get the claim denied or cause a big problem. Here are some of the red flags that we see crop up: ·          Work after the alleged onset date (AOD).   Since the process takes so long, many claimants feel that they are forced to return to work for income.   Social Security often sees this as a sign that the claimant is not disabled. ·          Severe substance abuse.   Chronic and frequent abuse of drugs or alcohol can pose problems. ·           A skimpy work record.   A claimant who has worked very little or has jumped from job to job frequently may not have good credibility. ·          Quitting wo...

WHAT YOU WILL BE ASKED AT A DISABILITY HEARING

Most Social Security disability claims will be denied twice:  First at the end of the Application process, and again after the "Reconsideration" process.  The third stop will be a hearing before a federal Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). It is here at the hearing level that most SSDI claims are paid.  So, what do you need to know about your Social Security disability hearing?     First, the judge will follow the rules established by the Social Security Administration.  His or her job is to determine whether you meet the particular laws and rules to receive disability payments.  So, it is a legal proceeding where you must prove certain things in order to get paid. Among the things you must prove:  Your insured status with Social Security:  You have worked recently enough and paid into the Social Security trust fund to gain the required "work credits" to support your claim.  You have a severe medical or mental impairment supported by adequa...

HOW TO COMPLETE A FUNCTION REPORT OR ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING FORM

After you apply for Social Security Disability (SSDI), you will be sent a FUNCTION REPORT to fill out and return.  This form asks a lot of very detailed questions about your daily activities:  driving, cooking, cleaning, dressing, visiting others, hobbies, etc. The Social Security Administration will use your answers to determine whether you can work or not.  You must show on this Function Report that you have limitations that do not permit you to work a full-time job.  You do this by showing your limitations in activities of daily living. Your goal in the Function Report is to show the struggles and challenges you have with everyday life.  It may not be sufficient to answer a question with "Yes" and fail to explain. For example:  "Can you drive?"  If you answer "Yes," Social Security will assume that your ability to drive is unlimited:  you can drive anytime, anywhere and as often or as far as you want.  That may not be true and would need t...