Skip to main content

FEDERAL COURT STRIKES A BLOW AT SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY

On November 4, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the Court which considers appeals from district courts within Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin, issued a decision in which it concluded the ability to perform 89,000 jobs in the entire United States economy amounted to the ability to perform a “significant number of jobs” in the national economy.

In concluding a Social Security claimant is not disabled, an Administrative Law Judge must prove that the claimant, with all of their physical and mental limitations, can perform either a job they previously performed in the past 15 years or other jobs which exist in “significant” numbers in the national economy. The term "significant number of jobs" is not defined by the Social Security Administration. This final step is especially difficult for Social Security judges, especially where a person is physically limited to only “sit-down” work and has not acquired significant technical skills during their career, so that they have no transferable skills.  Under those circumstances, there are not many jobs in the American economy that such an individual can perform.

When a vocational witness testifies that my client can perform a certain sit down job and that there are 25,000 or 30,090 of those jobs in the US economy, I usually object that isn't a significant number of jobs.  The Administrative Law Judge has discretion on what constitutes a "reasonable number of jobs."

In the above case, the claimant was denied Social Security disability benefits because the vocational witness testified that there were 89,000 jobs in the national economy that the claimant can still perform.  The claimant's attorney objected that 89,000 jobs is not a "significant number of jobs" when they are spread all over the United States.  The Seventh Circuit disagreed, holding that if the individual is able to perform one of 89,000 jobs, he is not disabled under Social Security rules.

However, this federal court decision does not specify what number of jobs below 89,000 represents a "substantial number."  Is 50,000 a significant number?  Is 25,000?

 Also, this decision affects only cases in the states of Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin.  It's very important to develop evidence of a claimant's functional restrictions and abilities in SSDI cases.  Obviously, the fewer jobs the claimant is capable of doing the more likely he/she will be found disabled. The claimant should work closely with his/her lawyer or advocate to make all limitations and restrictions understood.  The lawyer or advocate, on the other hand, should make every effort to submit medical evidence to prove these restrictions.



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASE

What are the top 3 most important factors in a Social Security disability case? 1.  Medical Evidence. 2.  Medical Evidence 3.  Medical Evidence 4-10     Medical Evidence Federal regulations set the eligibility requirements for Social Security disability (SSDI) benefits.  A claimant must meet these strict legal requirements More than anything else, the claimant's medical evidence will determine the outcome of the claim or appeal.  Without strong objective medical evidence Social Security cannot legally pay you a benefit. Objective Medical Evidence means the result of medical examinations, laboratory tests or imaging studies (X-rays, PT scans, MRI or CT scans). This type of evidence can only be obtained by going to your doctor. There's an old adage that says truthfully:  "The path to Social Security disability benefits runs straight through your doctor's office."  Being approved for an SSDI benefit requires objective medical proof. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

IS IT HARD TO GET SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY IN TENNESSEE?

  How hard is it to get Social Security disability (SSDI) in Tennessee? It can be very difficult.  In the beginning stages of the process, it seems like the agency is out to deny as many claims as possible.  Later--in the appeals process--it takes more technical and legal skill to move through the labyrinth of obstacles. What's the usual reason for an SSDI denial? If you look at all the denial letters, the most comm on reason given is:  You are not disabled according to our rules. The 2 main explanation for finding claimants not disabled are: 1.  You are able to perform some of your past relevant work. 2.  You can't perform any of your past work but you are able to do other work. Those are the two "catch all" reasons Social Security gives for nearly all of their denials.  Both of these reasons fall into the category of a medical denial .  The claimant's condition is not deemed severe enough to prevent all work. There are other reasons for d...
Post a Comment
Read more

CAN YOU WIN YOUR DISABILITY APPEAL WITHOUT A LAWYER?

The Social Security Administration does not require you to have a lawyer to file an appeal or to appear at a hearing.  However, most people heading for a disability hearing will hire a lawyer or advocate to help them.   Studies have shown that you are about twice as likely to win with a lawyer.  A recent study found that claimants with no lawyer win about 30 percent of the time while claimants with a lawyer or advocate win 60 percent of the time.   " He just cooked his own goose." These statistics cover only one aspect of a disability appear--your odds of winning. The other important aspects are time and convenience. If you prepare and adjudicate your own disability appeal, expect to spend 12 to 24 months working on the case.  You will be collecting, reading and submitting hundreds or thousands of pages of medical records.  These records are complex and often difficult to understand.  And you must know how each medical record helps (or hurts) your dis...
Post a Comment
Read more