Skip to main content

FEDERAL COURT STRIKES A BLOW AT SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY

On November 4, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the Court which considers appeals from district courts within Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin, issued a decision in which it concluded the ability to perform 89,000 jobs in the entire United States economy amounted to the ability to perform a “significant number of jobs” in the national economy.

In concluding a Social Security claimant is not disabled, an Administrative Law Judge must prove that the claimant, with all of their physical and mental limitations, can perform either a job they previously performed in the past 15 years or other jobs which exist in “significant” numbers in the national economy. The term "significant number of jobs" is not defined by the Social Security Administration. This final step is especially difficult for Social Security judges, especially where a person is physically limited to only “sit-down” work and has not acquired significant technical skills during their career, so that they have no transferable skills.  Under those circumstances, there are not many jobs in the American economy that such an individual can perform.

When a vocational witness testifies that my client can perform a certain sit down job and that there are 25,000 or 30,090 of those jobs in the US economy, I usually object that isn't a significant number of jobs.  The Administrative Law Judge has discretion on what constitutes a "reasonable number of jobs."

In the above case, the claimant was denied Social Security disability benefits because the vocational witness testified that there were 89,000 jobs in the national economy that the claimant can still perform.  The claimant's attorney objected that 89,000 jobs is not a "significant number of jobs" when they are spread all over the United States.  The Seventh Circuit disagreed, holding that if the individual is able to perform one of 89,000 jobs, he is not disabled under Social Security rules.

However, this federal court decision does not specify what number of jobs below 89,000 represents a "substantial number."  Is 50,000 a significant number?  Is 25,000?

 Also, this decision affects only cases in the states of Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin.  It's very important to develop evidence of a claimant's functional restrictions and abilities in SSDI cases.  Obviously, the fewer jobs the claimant is capable of doing the more likely he/she will be found disabled. The claimant should work closely with his/her lawyer or advocate to make all limitations and restrictions understood.  The lawyer or advocate, on the other hand, should make every effort to submit medical evidence to prove these restrictions.



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CASE

What are the top 3 most important factors in a Social Security disability case? 1.  Medical Evidence. 2.  Medical Evidence 3.  Medical Evidence 4-10     Medical Evidence Federal regulations set the eligibility requirements for Social Security disability (SSDI) benefits.  A claimant must meet these strict legal requirements More than anything else, the claimant's medical evidence will determine the outcome of the claim or appeal.  Without strong objective medical evidence Social Security cannot legally pay you a benefit. Objective Medical Evidence means the result of medical examinations, laboratory tests or imaging studies (X-rays, PT scans, MRI or CT scans). This type of evidence can only be obtained by going to your doctor. There's an old adage that says truthfully:  "The path to Social Security disability benefits runs straight through your doctor's office."  Being approved for an SSDI benefit requires objective medical proof. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

SOCIAL SECRITY DISABILITY: THE DECISION WRITING PROCESS

  By Charles W. Forsythe - The Forsythe Firm in Huntsville An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) has made a decision on your Social Security disability appeal hearing. The decision must now be sent to to a process called "Decision Writing" - where an attorney or paralegal will draft the formal binding decision, explaining the judge's legal rationale for the decision and explaining the mandatory 5-Step decision making process. The decision writing process translates a judge's ruling into a formal, legally binding document. It is a vital but time-consuming phase that ensures all medical evidence and vocational factors align with the law. A typical written decision will be 10 to 20 pages, thus very detailed.  It takes time to write one. There are many decisions ahead of yours and usually they are written in the order received. The step-by-step process breaks down as follows: The Judge’s Ruling & Instructions:  Following your hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) r...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNDERSTANDING THE 5-STEP SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY PROCESS

Receiving Social Security disability payments depend on one thing:  Proving that you are not able to work. The one and only thing that SSDI pays for is the physical and/or mental inability to work for a period of at least 12 months.  Who decides if you are able to work?  The Social Security Administration (SSA) will decide.--according to their own strict rules and regulations. In reaching that important decision, are you disabled or not, Social Security must use a 5-step examination process.  It's important to understand these 5 sequential steps. STEP 1:  The work Test .  Is the claimant now engaged in Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)?  If yes, the claim is denied at Step 1.  They look no further.  You cannot be eligible for SSDI benefits if you are working at SGA, regardles of your medical condition.  (In 2026 you are working at SGA if you earn at least $1,690 per month from work or self-employment). STEP 2.  The Medical Requirem...
Post a Comment
Read more